<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fabian Libertarianism?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dmitrychernikov.com/blog/index.php/2008/05/12/fabian-libertarianism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dmitrychernikov.com/blog/2008/05/12/fabian-libertarianism/</link>
	<description>Philosophy, theology, economics, and liberty.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 06:38:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Politics in America &#187; Fabian Libertarianism?</title>
		<link>http://dmitrychernikov.com/blog/2008/05/12/fabian-libertarianism/comment-page-1/#comment-17850</link>
		<dc:creator>Politics in America &#187; Fabian Libertarianism?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 03:52:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmitrychernikov.com/blog/?p=497#comment-17850</guid>
		<description>[...] Global Voices Online wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerpt Why it won’t work, proves Rothbard: Another alternative right-wing strategy is that commonly pursued by many libertarian or conservative think tanks: that of quiet persuasion, not in the groves of academe, but in Washington, D.C., in the corridors of power. This has been called the “Fabian” strategy, with think tanks issuing reports calling for a two percent cut in a tax here, or a tiny drop in a regulation there. The supporters of this strategy often point to the success of the Fabian Societ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Global Voices Online wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerpt Why it won’t work, proves Rothbard: Another alternative right-wing strategy is that commonly pursued by many libertarian or conservative think tanks: that of quiet persuasion, not in the groves of academe, but in Washington, D.C., in the corridors of power. This has been called the “Fabian” strategy, with think tanks issuing reports calling for a two percent cut in a tax here, or a tiny drop in a regulation there. The supporters of this strategy often point to the success of the Fabian Societ [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
