Archive for March, 2009
Lew on Academic Freedom
Here is this beautiful article. “Universities, like cathedrals, were sanctuaries from wars, political machinations, revolutions, and kingly belligerence… ‘even under the Russian czars the police were forbidden to enter the university’.”
Posted: March 31st, 2009 under Philosophy, Political.
Comments: none
The Real Social Contract
Mises believed that private property is useful only insofar as it serves human ends: Private property is a human device. It is not sacred. It came into existence in early ages of history, when people with their own power and by their own authority appropriated to themselves what had previously not been anybody’s property. Again [...]
Posted: March 31st, 2009 under Philosophy, Political.
Comments: none
Re: The Outsider Test for Faith, Part II
Rothbard posed the question: who are the greater villains with respect to liberty, the unwashed masses or the power elite? His answer was: First, even granting for a moment that the masses are the worst possible, that they are perpetually Hell-bent on lynching anyone down the block, the mass of people simply don’t have the [...]
Posted: March 26th, 2009 under Philosophy, Religion.
Comments: 6
Re: The Outsider Test for Faith
In “The Outsider Test for Faith” John Loftus exhorts us to step outside our faith and examine it with the skeptical eyes of a foreigner. His argument is that an average person’s coming to have the particular faith that they have does not depend on the virtues of the faith itself but on factors that [...]
Posted: March 26th, 2009 under Philosophy, Religion.
Comments: 6
Notes on the Argumentation Ethics, Part II
Suppose that a robber in a restaurant yells at the customers: “I am not going to argue with you; just give me all your money. Any of you fucking pricks move, and I’ll execute every motherfucking last one of ya!” Hoppe’s argument fails to convict the robber of irrationality. Similarly, suppose that in some bar [...]
Posted: March 25th, 2009 under Ethics, Philosophy.
Comments: none
The 4th Way: Examples
Material cause: stinkiness is caused by the predominance of certain molecules in the air, and it “participates” in maximal stinkiness which is a gas or even a solid packed with stinky molecules. Formal cause: the bust of Mises is an imperfect version of the real Mises who is the archetype for the bust. Efficient cause: [...]
Posted: March 25th, 2009 under Metaphysics, Philosophy.
Comments: none
“Goodness and Choice”
This is a remarkable article by Philippa Foot, stunning us with countless examples of how the word “good” is used. But, unbeknownst to her, all of these uses come under one of three categories: physical, moral, or metaphysical. Foot objects against the argument that reduces goodness to “that which is chosen.” And she is right: [...]
Posted: March 24th, 2009 under Ethics, Philosophy.
Comments: none
Mises on Earmarks!
Here’s Ron Paul on earmarks. And here’s Mises, discussing the same issue 60 years ago: Those advocation a restriction of the parliament’s prerogatives in budgeting and taxation issues or even a complete substitution of authoritarian government for representative government are blinded by the chimerical image of a perfect chief of state. This man, no less [...]
Posted: March 24th, 2009 under Philosophy, Political.
Comments: none
Moral Statements as Commands
One version of emotivism claims that moral statements are “action-guiding” commands: “X is good” means “Do X!” The trouble with that is that a command can be obeyed or disobeyed, and one needs a reason to obey it. I mean, who are you to tell me what to do? The obvious rejoinder to “Do X!” [...]
Posted: March 24th, 2009 under Ethics, Philosophy.
Comments: none
Mises on Hegel
Modern civilization is a product of the philosophy of laissez faire. It cannot be preserved under the ideology of government omnipotence. Statolatry owes much to the doctrines of Hegel. However, one may pass over many of Hegel’s inexcusable faults, for Hegel also coined the phrase “the futility of victory.” To defeat the aggressors is not [...]
Posted: March 24th, 2009 under Philosophy, Political.
Comments: none
Thoughts on Copyrights and Trade Secrets
Intellectual property issues are hot among libertarians now, spurred by Jeffrey Tucker’s live blogging of Against Intellectual Monopoly and renewed interest in Stephan Kinsella’s “Against Intellectual Property.” Below I attempt to sketch a theory of copyrights and trade secrets. The crucial term relevant to IP is “information” whose nature it is to reside in minds [...]
Posted: March 23rd, 2009 under Ethics, Philosophy, Political.
Comments: none
A Nation of Cowards
The original one.
Posted: March 20th, 2009 under Philosophy, Political.
Comments: 11
Ethical Dilemmas
Consider some examples: (1) A runaway trolley driver can steer it on track A, killing 5, or on track B, killing 1. (2) In order to survive, person Q needs the entire dose of the drug available at the hospital; but persons P1, …, P5 at the same hospital can be saved with just 1/5 [...]
Posted: March 20th, 2009 under Ethics, Philosophy.
Comments: none
Whether Moral Virtues Can Co-exist with a Malicious Will?
Mises writes on this very topic that “soldiery virtues” are not good in themselves; and, in fact, whoever thinks that “must, to be consistent, likewise acknowledge as noble virtues the daring, intrepidity, and contempt for death of the robber.” (Liberalism, 24) So, can courage be a vice? Is it better to be an insane vampire [...]
Posted: March 20th, 2009 under Ethics, Philosophy.
Comments: none
Whether Virtues are Corrective?
Yes, insofar as they find fulfillment in 2nd-order desires to correct or counteract 1st-order desires. Without temptations there would be no need for virtues: human powers would on their own incline to good only. Now is that man virtuous who adheres to virtue with great difficulty and inner struggle or one who adheres to it [...]
Posted: March 19th, 2009 under Ethics, Philosophy.
Comments: none
Arts and Virtues
What’s the difference between an art or skill and a virtue? The obvious one that comes to mind is that virtues are essential to human survival, and, while so is some art, if its possessor is to participate in social cooperation, no particular art is essential. On the other hand, each virtue, by quickening its [...]
Posted: March 19th, 2009 under Ethics, Philosophy.
Comments: none
What is History?
“What is history, but a disgusting and painful detail of the butcheries of conquerors, and the woeful calamities of the conquered?” – Anti-Federalist #3.
Posted: March 19th, 2009 under Philosophy, Political.
Comments: none
Supererogation: A Trick Example
Friendship imposes on one greater duties than social cooperation in general. It is the essence of friendship that friends ought to treat each other with more care than strangers ought to. But becoming friends with someone is not going above and beyond the call of duty impressed upon one by the larger society. This is [...]
Posted: March 18th, 2009 under Ethics, Philosophy.
Comments: none
Poems!
I don’t understand why I have to leaf through The Oxford Book of American Poetry in search of poems that actually rhyme. But here are a couple of delightful ones: Dawn An angel, robed in spotless white, Bent down and kissed the sleeping Night. Night woke to blush; the sprite was gone. Men saw the [...]
Posted: March 17th, 2009 under Humor.
Comments: none
Notes on the Argumentation Ethics
1. Mitchell Jones writes: “Being alive surely presupposes access to food; but, just as surely, it does not presuppose that you have a right to access to food, or even that the particular food to which you have access is yours by right. (Consuming stolen food can sustain life and the ability to argue.)” This [...]
Posted: March 17th, 2009 under Philosophy, Political.
Comments: none