Archive for March 24th, 2009
“Goodness and Choice”
This is a remarkable article by Philippa Foot, stunning us with countless examples of how the word “good” is used. But, unbeknownst to her, all of these uses come under one of three categories: physical, moral, or metaphysical. Foot objects against the argument that reduces goodness to “that which is chosen.” And she is right: [...]
Posted: March 24th, 2009 under Ethics, Philosophy.
Comments: none
Mises on Earmarks!
Here’s Ron Paul on earmarks. And here’s Mises, discussing the same issue 60 years ago: Those advocation a restriction of the parliament’s prerogatives in budgeting and taxation issues or even a complete substitution of authoritarian government for representative government are blinded by the chimerical image of a perfect chief of state. This man, no less [...]
Posted: March 24th, 2009 under Philosophy, Political.
Comments: none
Moral Statements as Commands
One version of emotivism claims that moral statements are “action-guiding” commands: “X is good” means “Do X!” The trouble with that is that a command can be obeyed or disobeyed, and one needs a reason to obey it. I mean, who are you to tell me what to do? The obvious rejoinder to “Do X!” [...]
Posted: March 24th, 2009 under Ethics, Philosophy.
Comments: none
Mises on Hegel
Modern civilization is a product of the philosophy of laissez faire. It cannot be preserved under the ideology of government omnipotence. Statolatry owes much to the doctrines of Hegel. However, one may pass over many of Hegel’s inexcusable faults, for Hegel also coined the phrase “the futility of victory.” To defeat the aggressors is not [...]
Posted: March 24th, 2009 under Philosophy, Political.
Comments: none