Main menu:

Site search

Categories

March 2009
S M T W T F S
« Feb   Apr »
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031  

Tags

Arguments for God's Pure Actuality

Blogroll

Ethics: Artistic Integrity

Ethics: Rule Utilitarianism

Review of "Natural Atheism"

Review of "Satisficing and Maximizing"

Review of "The Improbability of God"

Moral Statements as Commands

One version of emotivism claims that moral statements are “action-guiding” commands: “X is good” means “Do X!” The trouble with that is that a command can be obeyed or disobeyed, and one needs a reason to obey it. I mean, who are you to tell me what to do? The obvious rejoinder to “Do X!” is “Why should I?” And that brings up back to cognitivism and even naturalism: “You should, because in doing it you will conform your soul to the Good or because you will enjoy it,” which is a proposition which is either true or false, and also a reduction of the term “good” either to conformance to a moral ideal or to pleasure.

Write a comment