The previous post deals with the first objection and proposes that divine goodness creates beautiful things. To the extent that beauty is goodness, every rational creature that exists is good and good in proportion to its beauty and true happiness.
What about the second objection? First, we need to determine how God loves people.
I believe that God loves us by rooting for us, cheering for us, egging us on, saying: “Come on, do something interesting! Accomplish something! Have fun! Go!” He takes our search for happiness to heart and even assists whenever necessary.
I analyze humans into component parts, such as essence (nature), accidents (virtue), and acts (happiness), where by acts I mean the answer to the question “What fun and exciting thing are you doing right now?” But God, if He loves, loves the whole of man. The question then becomes: What is the essence of human identity?
Moreover, it’s not that I have a nature, as though a separate object or property from me; I am in part my nature. It’s not that I have character traits; I am my character. And it’s not that I am enjoying something; I am in act.
The essence of identity is to build it up self-consciously on the virtue tier and then forget all about it on the happiness tier. Identity is its rejection or perhaps transcendence, when rightly understood, as one focuses no longer on perfecting oneself but on mastering and enjoying what he is doing, being so caught up in the moment that he forgets about himself.
The more in act or truly happy we are, the more enthusiastic God becomes at supporting us. God has no patience for mere states (more permanent like nature or even more changeable like virtue); He wants and loves action.
Thus, the more in act one is, the more God delights in him.
Then I do not so much enjoy true happiness as I am my own true happiness. But since true happiness is a definite good, then God does not so much will good to me as wills me to be — overall — good. It is true that man acts for an end; but the end is he himself!
As I become in part true happiness (only God is wholly pure act), I become good, and this is the sense in which I and all human beings are good by virtue of their mere existence.
The syllogism is as follows:
(1) Happiness is good.
(2) I (= what I am + who I am + what I am doing) am somewhat my own happiness.
(3) I am good.
By what has been said the third objection may be easily solved.