Christ says, “Strive for righteousness, and I will forgive your past sins.”

Heretical cult leaders say, “Obey me, and I will allow you to sin in the future at your pleasure without guilt.”

(1) Such a leader is no God; (2) his doctrine is false; (3) what he offers is impossible. It’s a scam.

Transgenderist cultists, for example, require total obedience to their dogma.

Any deviation from the party line, whatever it may be at any given moment, is punished with instant excommunication and condemnation.

In return, the faithful are offered full freedom from all moral restraints. They are the elect and can do no wrong.

Salvation is by faith, ideological purity guarantees perfect righteousness.

For many people, this is an attractive trade.

I am in favor of women’s liberation.

Women should be liberated from home, family, and children so that they can toil thanklessly in routine and monotonous jobs within faceless corporations until they are old and gray.

The law limits my pleasure, the woke say, so to hell with the law.

Of course, in the end, it will be the law that will send them to hell.

The paradox is that the Idealist Left is morally absolutist and does not reject law as such; they make up their own, and it’s batshit crazy.

As I write in Secrets, there are worse things than relativism, specifically getting your absolute morality wrong.

You see, personal fulfillment includes “feeling righteous,” and righteousness involves obedience to law. But discovery of and adherence to the true law is hard. But if you make up your own moral code, however arbitrary, you can more easily claim to be holy and signal this to others.

So, for example, I say, “trans women are women” (or whatever). Now I and everyone who agrees with me are the elect, “subtle in spirit,” and saved, at least for the time being; all those who defy me are by that fact the non-elect, “crude in spirit,” and condemned. Satisfying, isn’t it?

One good thing about being subtle in spirit is antinomianism: it’s impossible for one to sin. Whatever one does is always right and just. At the same time the non-elect are unregenerate scum who can be treated like dirt. So we end up with both extremes: merciless and ever-changing law on the one hand, and total license on the other.

This is another face of anarcho-tyranny today.

Neocons want a “benevolent empire” (an oxymoron like totalitarian democracy, liberal egalitarianism, or market socialism) to spread American values.

It’s ludicrous. There are no American values, not anymore. There is only madness, perversion, and wickedness.

For the health of the world we must self-isolate.

The only reason for a community, on any level, to have a legislature empowered to pass positive law is to serve utilitarianism, i.e., the greatest good for the greatest number.

Positive law may deviate to some extent from natural law for the sake of this end.

So, we’d have utilitarian law and utilitarian taxes whose benefits on the whole outweigh the costs. Even if taxation is admitted to be theft, we are trading justice for welfare.

As an empirical matter, genuinely utilitarian taxes are very low.

But in the case of the U.S. Congress, all the congressmen are crooks and sellouts. It’s not that the congressmen should be schooled in economics, or something of that sort. It’s that the government is run by private interests for private profit, not for the common or greatest good.

As a result, the Congress is worse than useless, it is an evil institution. So as per the Declaration of Independence, “whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it…”

And that’s just what needs to be done. National divorce is beginning to sound like a great idea.

It is an indisputable fact that white people are, on average, morally and intellectually superior to blacks.

This does not entail that whites are oppressors and blacks are oppressed.

That Smith is in various ways better than Jones does not by itself make Smith evil and Jones good.

The superior do not by virtue of being superior oppress the inferior. The righteous are not oppressing the sinners. The smart are not oppressing the stupid.

Only if egalitarianism is true is it the case that the better off are wicked by not being equal to the worse off.

But egalitarianism is one of the most vicious and inhuman doctrines ever developed by white people. We must reject it without compromise.

The story about the Colorado school banning the Gadsden “Don’t Tread on Me” flag suggests that the “teachers” seek to turn children into mindless drones beholden to lies.

But note the contradiction.

If anyone deserves to be turned into drones, it’s blacks, for their own and the greater good.

If blacks were obedient worker-bees unquestioningly following orders, it would massively lower the crime rate and welfare costs. Instead, they are let loose and told that they are oppressed and can do no wrong.

The same is true for the alleged trannies. Why not stop corrupting the kids?

But no. The normal and good must be debased, and the monsters and sickos elevated.

It just shows that the Left, in change of the state and all the major institutions, seeks only to destroy.