David Marcus advertises for Ocasio-Cortez:

She has “falsely” claimed, you see, that

AIPAC has paid politicians to ignore right and wrong and simply do what their Jewish benefactors demand.

This claim is absurd on its face and makes reference to centuries old claims that greedy Jews are subverting decent society with their big bags of shekels.

Well, of course Jews pay off politicians. Everyone does; that’s what the politicians are for — for sale. (And that’s a good thing — I, for one, like my Democrats less socialistic and more corrupt.)

But Jews are the smartest ethnic group on the face of the earth and therefore rich; they are clannish, ruthless, and therefore able and willing to buy congressmen. What’s “false” about that? Jews should be proud of their political savvy.

(Of course, Jews would not have anywhere near the influence the do have if the American Christians did not support them, but that’s another subject altogether.)

In fact, they should pay Omar and AOC to take their side. I imagine these girls are easily corruptible.

The second claim is that American Jews who support Israel are engaged in dual loyalty. That their real allegiance is not to the United States but to Israel and Judaism.

Many are not. Some are. Be smarter and learn to discriminate, David. Oh, and speak for yourself. You are trying to make Jews into pathetic victims again. You are an embarrassment, so keep your mouth shut.

They say there are no atheists in foxholes.

On the contrary, there are only atheists in foxholes.

A Christian would understand that he would burn for committing his mass murders and find a way to escape the war ASAP.

Some of those who minister to “veterans” are laboring under the delusion that there is no difference between saving innocents and killing them. For them, both are equally masculine, presumably because they involve “power.”

However, the former is true masculinity; the latter is complete betrayal of it.

Creative power to bring light into the world and destructive power to murder, plunder, and sow chaos and misery are polar moral opposites.

Case in point: “Veterans Should Never Go Hungry.”

But why? For the evil that they do, “veterans” deserve our contempt, exactly as the politicians who command them.

They should go hungry. Always.

They are no different from the Mongol Horde, an army of darkness.

The 20th century abolished warfare as an institution by converting it from a somewhat rational limited war into total war, i.e., total madness.

We libertarians must strive not to restore this dubious enterprise but to abolish it, too, except from the opposite direction of —

As part of that, it will be necessary to de-legitimize soldiering as a profession.

Just as we do not romanticize slave hunters, neither do we have anything positive to say about the brainwashed killers for the state people call “veterans.”

Privately, veterans should be called to repentance and urged to atone for their crimes by making themselves useful to society within the free market.

This takes the cake as the most meaningless PC piece I’ve ever read (so far).

I mean, she gave them cotton; it’s not like she took it away.

If she had stolen the cotton, I’d understand why they were upset.

It’s just one robotic NPC sentence after another, like

The first lady’s actions, while I don’t think were intentionally malicious, are indicative of an urgent need for education and dialogue around race, history, and culture at all levels of American society.

No, we urgently need less “education” (propaganda and brainwashing) and “dialog” (autistic screeching) about this nonsense. Shut up and mind your own business!