Why can’t these people be “body positive” in private?
Must they unleash the many folds of their hideous flesh upon innocent people?
Why can’t these people be “body positive” in private?
Must they unleash the many folds of their hideous flesh upon innocent people?
GLAAD said of J.K. Rowling that she “has now aligned herself with an anti-science ideology that denies the basic humanity of people who are transgender.”
This is how she should’ve replied:
Idiots! You’re anti-science — anti-biology. And I did not “deny the basic humanity” of anyone; I denied only that trannies are human females; they remain of course fully human males.
If I were a radical feminist, I’d argue that transgenderism was a weird trick or ruse of a dying patriarchy.
Men see that women are gaining power relative to them, so they are trying to switch teams to join the ranks of a rising class, however implausible the attempts.
Sicko American justice: 16 years in prison for burning a flag that eminently deserved its fate.
Haven’t the bourgeoisie been shocked beyond caring already?
Any MSM article which describes a mass shooting and does not identify the race of the perpetrator must be taken clearly to imply that the shooter is a “person of color.”
Persons of color are also imbued with holy charity and are long-suffering but patient-in-adversity, resilient, and cheerful victims of an unjust society, so it is impossible for them to commit a “hate crime.”
Update. And here’s another case linked to by Lew Rockwell. All the characters in the story are obviously black. Their race is not mentioned a single time.
The environmentalist Greta Thunberg, the Time Magazine 2019 Person of the Year, represents a failed investment of a ton of idealism and youthful feeling into an exceedingly stupid and destructive cause.
The disgusting and dumb AOC should stare at the ceiling, not reach for the skies.
The “Russian hackers interfering in our elections,” whatever the reality here, is, too, a cost of the American empire.
The US government wants to, in Rothbard’s memorable phrase, invade the world, wreaking havoc and destruction wherever it sends the Marines.
It “intervenes,” violently, clumsily, and foolishly.
It should not be surprised that, given the stakes, the world intervenes back.
To imitate Gandhi, “white supremacy” would be a “good idea.”
I mean, it’s going to be someone’s supremacy, unless anarcho-capitalism will suddently arrive. Why not white people’s? They seem to have done Ok for themselves.
It’s certainly better than black supremacy or Mexican supremacy.
Other than that, the charge of “white supremacy” is idiotic and is simply a bludgeon to beat white people over the head with whenever they assert their freedom of association or racial solidarity or friendship.
You shall not be exclusive, is the great commandment of the modern PC religion. Sorry, I’m not into it.