I’m in favor of no-bail laws. A guy who is arrested has not been found guilty of any crime. Why should the state be able to imprison him and demand a ransom for his freedom?

The only reason for bail is to set up an incentive for the accused to attend his trial. But who cares? The sufficient incentive is the need to defend oneself. If one does not show up, then let the trial commence in absentia. It is even more likely that the guy will be convicted this way.

Then, once a sentence has been declared, let him be arrested again and imprisoned permanently.

Categories: Uncategorized


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *