There is no such thing as correct libertarian strategy, because no libertarian strategy has ever worked. Ever.

Liberty + property is a lost cause and will remain that way in the foreseeable future.

On the other hand, that means we have nowhere to go but up.

Filmmaker Michael Moore tweeted: “Trump’s America: The last days of White rule. It’s always a bitch to have to give up power you’ve held for 300 years.”

Well, whose rule is to come after then? Who will obtain the power once white people have been dethroned?

Black people will rule? Michael Moore personally will rule? No one will rule, because anarcho-capitalism will be immediately established?

Can we have more details on the new social order after the coming Moorean revolution?

Jews who migrated to Israel did so precisely for the reason that they wanted to live among other Jews. It’s an explicit restrictive association.

America, on the other hand, is and always has been exceedingly diverse. It’s a fact of life.

Therefore, Jewish ethnic nationalism in Israel can succeed, while white nationalism in America is entirely futile.

If you are a white person, buy a house in a decent neighborhood and, to the extent the law allows, exclude undesirables from moving in.

I don’t see what more you can realistically do.

As Douglas Wilson points out, correctly, socialism is run by ideological socialists, while capitalism today is run by businessmen, i.e., people with capital or entrepreneurs, not by ideological capitalists.

It is this asymmetry that is directly responsible for our interventionist mixed economy, i.e., “crapitalism.”

“Firing Damore was too extreme and Google should have put him through training instead, said Aaron Ginn, co-founder of the Lincoln Network, a group of libertarian-leaning tech workers and investors.”

Right, they should’ve put him through the sort of Orwellian torture and brainwashing to make him love the Big Bro… Google.

I kind of understand why they fired him, though. I mean, he totally humiliated the bosses (and deservedly so). How could they tolerate such mutiny? They could either fire him or promote him to senior management. They decided to fire him.

Oh well.

How can I tell that a person is not lying about his alleged offended feelings? Perhaps he is pretending to be offended in order to get me to grovel for or even pay him money for forgiveness.

Maybe that’s how he gets off, by faking outrage in order to humiliate those he falsely accuses of oppressing him. For all I know, inside, he is completely cynical and enjoys taking this sort of advantage of non-psychopathic people.

We should seriously consider the possibility that the culture of official certified victimhood is for the most part a lie by the “victims” in order to get sympathy, attention, revenge, and gifts.

Regarding the Google memo, Google makes itself less competitive by prioritizing “diversity” over its business self-interest and profits.

As a result, by becoming thus less competitive, it will shrink relative to the scenario in which it hired based on merit.

The more it shrinks, the less it will be able to afford to hire incompetents just because they are of the right race or sex.

Further, as it shrinks, the number of workers it employs will decrease.

And that includes the workers belonging to the alleged victim groups.

No worries, however: some new and less irrational entrepreneur will gladly take the Google’s market share.

If people tend to commit violent crimes, and the state is a tool to repress or deter such crimes, what’s to ensure that the state itself will not commit violent crimes?

Nothing. The only hope is that the overall amount of crime with the state will be smaller than the amount without the state.

On the local level, that’s probably true. On the imperial level, it’s 100% false.